You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Oncology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30214-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neyssa M Marina, Sigbjørn Smeland, Stefan S Bielack, Mark Bernstein, Gordana Jovic, Mark D Krailo, Jane M Hook, Carola Arndt, Henk van den Berg, Bernadette Brennan, Bénédicte Brichard, Ken L B Brown, Trude Butterfass-Bahloul, Gabriele Calaminus, Heike E Daldrup-Link, Mikael Eriksson, Mark C Gebhardt, Hans Gelderblom, Joachim Gerss, Robert Goldsby, Allen Goorin, Richard Gorlick, Holcombe E Grier, Juliet P Hale, Kirsten Sundby Hall, Jendrik Hardes, Douglas S Hawkins, Knut Helmke, Pancras C W Hogendoorn, Michael S Isakoff, Katherine A Janeway, Heribert Jürgens, Leo Kager, Thomas Kühne, Ching C Lau, Patrick J Leavey, Stephen L Lessnick, Leo Mascarenhas, Paul A Meyers, Hubert Mottl, Michaela Nathrath, Zsuzsanna Papai, R Lor Randall, Peter Reichardt, Marleen Renard, Akmal Ahmed Safwat, Cindy L Schwartz, Michael C G Stevens, Sandra J Strauss, Lisa Teot, Mathias Werner, Matthew R Sydes, Jeremy S Whelan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 347 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 15% |
| Other | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 85 | 24% |
| Unknown | 79 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 101 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#844,806
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#1,051
of 6,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,762
of 354,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#16
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.