↓ Skip to main content

Toward a Positive Aging Phenotype for Older Women: Observations From the Women’s Health Initiative

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a Positive Aging Phenotype for Older Women: Observations From the Women’s Health Initiative
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, April 2012
DOI 10.1093/gerona/gls117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy Fugate Woods, Barbara B. Cochrane, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Rebecca A. Seguin, Oleg Zaslavsky, Jingmin Liu, Jeannette M. Beasley, Robert L. Brunner, Mark A. Espeland, Joseph S Goveas, Dorothy S. Lane, JoAnn E. Manson, Charles P. Mouton, Jennifer G. Robinson, Lesley F. Tinker

Abstract

To develop a positive aging phenotype, we undertook analyses to describe multiple dimensions of positive aging and their relationships to one another in women 65 years of age and older and evaluate the performance of individual indicators and composite factors of this phenotype as predictors of time to death, years of healthy living, and years of independent living.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Psychology 14 13%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,152,304
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#2,755
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,349
of 174,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#34
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.