You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2000
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/b12345 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-041189-5, 978-3-54-040899-4
|
| Authors |
Scott L. Delp, Anthony M. DiGoia, Branislav Jaramaz |
| Editors |
Scott L. Delp, Anthony M. DiGoia, Branislav Jaramaz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 464 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | <1% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 461 | 99% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 461 | 99% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,648
of 8,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,408
of 112,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.