↓ Skip to main content

Asperger’s syndrome and high-functioning autism: language, motor and cognitive profiles

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Asperger’s syndrome and high-functioning autism: language, motor and cognitive profiles
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00787-009-0057-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Noterdaeme, Elke Wriedt, Christian Höhne

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the cognitive profile, the motor and language functioning and the psychosocial adaptation of children with Asperger syndrome (AS) and with high-functioning autism (HFA). Subjects were recruited through the department Autism and Developmental Disorders of the Heckscher-Klinikum. To be included in the study, the full-scale-IQ had to be at least 80. Subjects with AS had to have a normal early language development and subjects with HFA a clear delay in language development, as reported by their parents. The sample consisted of 57 children with Asperger syndrome and 55 children with high-functioning autism. The mean age of the children was 10 years. All subjects were examined with a standardised test battery. Children with AS had a higher full-scale-IQ than children with HFA. This was due to a higher verbal-IQ. There were no significant differences in the performance-IQ. At a mean age of 10 years, subjects with AS had better language skills than subjects with HFA, but at least 30% showed clear receptive language problems. Motor problems were present in about 50% of the children with AS and HFA. The level of psychosocial adaptation was clearly reduced, but was comparable for the two groups. The differences in verbal-IQ and language skills between the two groups could be explained through the definition of the syndromes. The presence of language problems in the subjects with AS at age 10, the comparable degree of motor impairment and level of psychosocial adaptation question the validity of the distinction between AS and HFA within the category of pervasive developmental disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 223 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 19%
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 10%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 12%
Linguistics 21 9%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 41 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,334,632
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#290
of 1,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,633
of 111,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.