↓ Skip to main content

Phototrophic purple sulfur bacteria as heat engines in the South Andros Black Hole

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Phototrophic purple sulfur bacteria as heat engines in the South Andros Black Hole
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11120-007-9246-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodney A. Herbert, Andrew Gall, Takashi Maoka, Richard J. Cogdell, Bruno Robert, Shinichi Takaichi, Stephanie Schwabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Researcher 9 25%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 36%
Physics and Astronomy 6 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 14%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,486,330
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#195
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,126
of 71,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.