| Title |
Clinical coding of long COVID in English primary care: a federated analysis of 58 million patient records in situ using OpenSAFELY
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex J Walker, Brian MacKenna, Peter Inglesby, Laurie Tomlinson, Christopher T Rentsch, Helen J Curtis, Caroline E Morton, Jessica Morley, Amir Mehrkar, Seb Bacon, George Hickman, Chris Bates, Richard Croker, David Evans, Tom Ward, Jonathan Cockburn, Simon Davy, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Anna Schultze, Elizabeth J Williamson, William J Hulme, Helen I McDonald, Rohini Mathur, Rosalind M Eggo, Kevin Wing, Angel YS Wong, Harriet Forbes, John Tazare, John Parry, Frank Hester, Sam Harper, Shaun O’Hanlon, Alex Eavis, Richard Jarvis, Dima Avramov, Paul Griffiths, Aaron Fowles, Nasreen Parkes, Ian J Douglas, Stephen JW Evans, Liam Smeeth, Ben Goldacre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 47 | 42% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 19% |
| Scientists | 17 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#171,201
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#63
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,970
of 456,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.