| Title |
Analyzing video recorded support of postnatal transition in preterm infants following a c-section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12884-016-1045-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dimitrios Konstantelos, Jürgen Dinger, Sascha Ifflaender, Mario Rüdiger |
| Abstract |
Over the past years, research on neonatal resuscitation has focused on single interventions. The present study was performed to analyze the process quality of delivery room management of preterm infants born by c-section in our institution. We performed a cross-sectional study of videos of preterm infants born by c-section. Videos were analyzed according to time point, duration and number of performed medical interventions. The study period occurred between January 2012 and December 2013. Infants were caterogized in 3 groups according to their gestational age. One hundred eleven videos were analyzed. 100 (90 %) of the infants were transferred to NICU and 91 (83 %) received respiratory support after a median of 0.5 min. All infants were auscultated after 8 (5-16) seconds median (IQR) and an oxygen saturation sensor was placed after 37 (28-52) seconds. 23 infants were intubated after 9 (6-17) minutes and 17 received exogenous surfactant; 29 % according to INSURE (intubation-surfactant-extubation) technique. The duration of intubation attempts was 47 (25-60) seconds. 51 % of the newborns received a sustained inflation for 8 (6-9) seconds. A successful IV-line placement occurred after 15 (12-20) minutes. 4 % of the infants were transported to the NICU without an IV-line after 3 (difference range: 2-5) unsuccessful attempts. Using video analysis as a tool to study process quality, we conclude that interventions differ not only between but also within similar age groups. This data can be used for benchmarking with current guidelines and practice in other centers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 18% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,970
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,929
of 343,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#103
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.