↓ Skip to main content

The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
441 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00415-005-0934-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. J. Coles, A. Cox, E. Le Page, J. Jones, S. A. Trip, J. Deans, S. Seaman, D. H. Miller, G. Hale, H. Waldmann, D. A. Compston

Abstract

From 1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath-1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In both the relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) stages of the illness, Campath-1H reduced the annual relapse rate (from 2.2 to 0.19 and from 0.7 to 0.001 respectively; both p < 0.001). Remarkably, MRI scans of patients with SP disease, treated with Campath-1H 7 years previously, showed no new lesion formation. However, despite these effects on inflammation, disability was differently affected depending on the phase of the disease. Patients with SPMS showed sustained accumulation of disability due to uncontrolled progression marked by unrelenting cerebral atrophy, attributable to ongoing axonal loss. The rate of cerebral atrophy was greatest in patients with established cerebral atrophy and highest inflammatory lesion burden before treatment (2.3 versus 0.7 ml/year; p = 0.04). In contrast, patients with RR disease showed an impressive reduction in disability at 6 months after Campath-1H (by a mean of 1.2 EDSS points) perhaps owing to a suppression of on-going inflammation in these patients with unusually active disease. In addition, there was a further significant, albeit smaller, mean improvement in disability up to 36 months after treatment. We speculate that this represents the beneficial effects of early rescue of neurons and axons from a toxic inflammatory environment, and that prevention of demyelination will prevent long-term axonal degeneration. These concepts are currently being tested in a controlled trial comparing Campath-1H and IFN-beta in the treatment of drug-naïve patients with early, active RR MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 235 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Professor 17 7%
Other 66 27%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 56 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,325,504
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#169
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,762
of 66,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.