| Title |
The Evaluation of a 1-h Prevention Program for Problem Gambling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11469-007-9121-5 |
| Authors |
Nigel Turner, John Macdonald, Mark Bartoshuk, Masood Zangeneh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 39% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#210
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,446
of 72,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.