↓ Skip to main content

Tests of Objectification Theory in Gay, Lesbian, and Heterosexual Community Samples: Mixed Evidence for Proposed Pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Tests of Objectification Theory in Gay, Lesbian, and Heterosexual Community Samples: Mixed Evidence for Proposed Pathways
Published in
Sex Roles, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11199-011-9958-8
Authors

Renee Engeln-Maddox, Steven A. Miller, David Matthew Doyle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 46%
Social Sciences 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,558
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,711
of 108,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#25
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.