↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Ingroup Bias and Gender Role Violations on Acquaintance Rape Attributions

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Ingroup Bias and Gender Role Violations on Acquaintance Rape Attributions
Published in
Sex Roles, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11199-008-9472-9
Authors

Lisa A. Harrison, Dawn M. Howerton, Ashley M. Secarea, Chau Q. Nguyen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 48%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,558
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,927
of 82,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.