| Title |
Team learning: building shared mental models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3 |
| Authors |
Piet Van den Bossche, Wim Gijselaers, Mien Segers, Geert Woltjer, Paul Kirschner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 583 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 121 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 119 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 10% |
| Researcher | 50 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 112 | 18% |
| Unknown | 114 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 121 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 103 | 17% |
| Psychology | 77 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 53 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 105 | 17% |
| Unknown | 126 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#342
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,809
of 106,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.