↓ Skip to main content

Peer Processes and Gender Role Development: Changes in Gender Atypicality Related to Negative Peer Treatment and Children’s Friendships

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Peer Processes and Gender Role Development: Changes in Gender Atypicality Related to Negative Peer Treatment and Children’s Friendships
Published in
Sex Roles, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11199-010-9883-2
Authors

Elizabeth A. Ewing Lee, Wendy Troop-Gordon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 42%
Social Sciences 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,558
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,994
of 99,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.