↓ Skip to main content

Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation
Published in
Sex Roles, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z
Authors

Kristin A. Lane, Jin X. Goh, Erin Driver-Linn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 190 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 34%
Social Sciences 33 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,558
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,938
of 119,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.