↓ Skip to main content

Eyewitness Memory in Context: Toward a Taxonomy of Eyewitness Error

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Eyewitness Memory in Context: Toward a Taxonomy of Eyewitness Error
Published in
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11896-008-9029-4
Authors

Matthew J. Sharps, Jessica Janigian, Adam B. Hess, Bill Hayward

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 42%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 54%
Social Sciences 5 19%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#282
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,385
of 171,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.