↓ Skip to main content

Investigating Investigators: Examining the Impact of Eyewitness Identification Evidence on Student-Investigators

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Human Behavior, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Investigating Investigators: Examining the Impact of Eyewitness Identification Evidence on Student-Investigators
Published in
Law and Human Behavior, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10979-007-9125-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa A. Boyce, D. Stephen Lindsay, C. A. E. Brimacombe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Portugal 1 4%
Greece 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 54%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Law and Human Behavior
#708
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,404
of 168,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Human Behavior
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.