↓ Skip to main content

Are Female Action Heroes Risky Role Models? Character Identification, Idealization, and Viewer Aggression

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Are Female Action Heroes Risky Role Models? Character Identification, Idealization, and Viewer Aggression
Published in
Sex Roles, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11199-007-9290-5
Authors

Dara N. Greenwood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 30%
Psychology 16 27%
Arts and Humanities 8 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,558
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,619
of 70,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#21
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.