| Title |
What Does a Random Line Look Like: An Experimental Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11469-009-9251-z |
| Authors |
Nigel E. Turner, Eleanor Liu, Tony Toneatto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 36% |
| Psychology | 2 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#625
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,876
of 96,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.