↓ Skip to main content

Chaos in The Courtroom Reconsidered: Emotional Bias and Juror Nullification

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Human Behavior, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Chaos in The Courtroom Reconsidered: Emotional Bias and Juror Nullification
Published in
Law and Human Behavior, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10979-006-9028-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irwin A. Horowitz, Norbert L. Kerr, Ernest S. Park, Christine Gockel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 47%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Law and Human Behavior
#708
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,727
of 84,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Human Behavior
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.