| Title |
Cancer Family History Reporting: Impact of Method and Psychosocial Factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetic Counseling, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10897-006-9076-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberly M. Kelly, Randi Shedlosky‐Shoemaker, Kyle Porter, Amber Remy, Philip DeSimone, Michael A. Andrykowski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 25% |
| Psychology | 11 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,442,064
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#403
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,209
of 76,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them