↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Approach and Avoidance Referents on Academic Outcomes: A Test of Competing Predictions

Overview of attention for article published in Motivation and Emotion, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Approach and Avoidance Referents on Academic Outcomes: A Test of Competing Predictions
Published in
Motivation and Emotion, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11031-006-9027-8
Authors

Helen W. Sullivan, Keilah A. Worth, Austin S. Baldwin, Alexander J. Rothman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
China 1 3%
Unknown 35 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 59%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 13%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Motivation and Emotion
#581
of 792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,356
of 67,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Motivation and Emotion
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.