↓ Skip to main content

Lamproglena chinensis Yü, 1937 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Lernaeidae), a gill parasite of the snakehead Channa argus (Cantor), from Kyushu, Japan, with an observation of the type specimens of L.

Overview of attention for article published in Crustacean Research, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lamproglena chinensis Yü, 1937 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Lernaeidae), a gill parasite of the snakehead Channa argus (Cantor), from Kyushu, Japan, with an observation of the type specimens of L. ophiocephali Yamaguti, 1939
Published in
Crustacean Research, June 2021
DOI 10.18353/crustacea.50.0_75
Authors

Daisuke Uyeno, Tadashi Tomizono, Yoshiyuki Osako, Kazuya Nagasawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#16,554,411
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Crustacean Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,415
of 432,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crustacean Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them