| Title |
Demographic Drivers of Aboveground Biomass Dynamics During Secondary Succession in Neotropical Dry and Wet Forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-016-0029-4 |
| Authors |
Danaë M. A. Rozendaal, Robin L. Chazdon, Felipe Arreola-Villa, Patricia Balvanera, Tony V. Bentos, Juan M. Dupuy, J. Luis Hernández-Stefanoni, Catarina C. Jakovac, Edwin E. Lebrija-Trejos, Madelon Lohbeck, Miguel Martínez-Ramos, Paulo E. S. Massoca, Jorge A. Meave, Rita C. G. Mesquita, Francisco Mora, Eduardo A. Pérez-García, I. Eunice Romero-Pérez, Irving Saenz-Pedroza, Michiel van Breugel, G. Bruce Williamson, Frans Bongers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,135,268
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#65
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,717
of 340,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.