↓ Skip to main content

Serving the clinician and the patient: three ways that quality clinical guidelines can build on expert consensus statements and systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serving the clinician and the patient: three ways that quality clinical guidelines can build on expert consensus statements and systematic reviews
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare L Ardern

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,269,564
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#5,032
of 6,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,227
of 338,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#106
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.