Title |
Iatrogenic aortic dissection after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13019-016-0531-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohamed Ehab Ramadan, Lamia Buohliqah, Juan Crestanello, James Ralston, David Igoe, Hamdy Awad |
Abstract |
As minimally invasive cardiac and vascular procedures are on the rise, the incidence of iatrogenic acute aortic dissection (IAAD) will increase. Cardiovascular professionals should be aware about the risk factors, means of prevention and best management options for IAAD in the perioperative setting. We present the successful clinical management of a complicated case of IAAD after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. High index of suspicion is required for prompt diagnosis of IAAD; collaboration of the whole perioperative team is imperative for management of this catastrophe. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#927
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,065
of 341,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.