| Title |
To be or not to be on Twitter, and its relationship with the tweeting and citation of research papers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-2113-0 |
| Authors |
José Luis Ortega |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 15% |
| United States | 8 | 8% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 63% |
| Scientists | 29 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 147 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Librarian | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 44 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#419,902
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#39
of 2,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,006
of 350,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.