↓ Skip to main content

A Note on the use of Steady–State Fluorescence Quenching to Quantify Nanoparticle–Protein Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fluorescence, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A Note on the use of Steady–State Fluorescence Quenching to Quantify Nanoparticle–Protein Interactions
Published in
Journal of Fluorescence, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10895-015-1665-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alioscka A. Sousa

Abstract

Steady-state fluorescence quenching is a commonly used technique to investigate the interactions between proteins and nanoparticles, providing quantitative information on binding affinity, stoichiometry and cooperativity. However, a failure to account for the limitations and pitfalls of the methodology can lead to significant errors in data analysis and interpretation. Thus, in this communication we first draw attention to a few common pitfalls in the use of fluorescence quenching to study nanoparticle-protein interactions. For example, we discuss a frequent mistake in the use of the Hill equation to determine cooperativity. We also test using both simulated and experimental data the application of a model-independent method of analysis to generate true thermodynamic nanoparticle-protein binding isotherms. This model-free approach allows for a quantitative description of the interactions independent of assumptions about the nature of the binding process [Bujalowski W, Lohman TM (1987) Biochemistry 26: 3099; Schwarz G (2000) Biophys. Chem. 86: 119].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,338,537
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fluorescence
#354
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,785
of 274,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fluorescence
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.