↓ Skip to main content

Drop-out rate among patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma: Literature review and real-life experience

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Drop-out rate among patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma: Literature review and real-life experience
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0290-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Caminati, G. Senna, G. Stefanizzi, R. Bellamoli, S. Longhi, F. Chieco-Bianchi, G. Guarnieri, S. Tognella, M. Olivieri, C. Micheletto, G. Festi, E. Bertocco, M. Mazza, A. Rossi, A. Vianello, on behalf of North East Omalizumab Network study group

Abstract

In patients with asthma, particularly severe asthma, poor adherence to inhaled drugs negatively affects the achievement of disease control. A better adherence rate is expected in the case of injected drugs, such as omalizumab, as they are administered only in a hospital setting. However, adherence to omalizumab has never been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to review the omalizumab drop-out rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies. A comparative analysis was performed between published data and the Italian North East Omalizumab Network (NEONet) database. In RCTs the drop-out rate ranged from 7.1 to 19.4 %. Although the reasons for withdrawal were only occasionally reported, patient decision and adverse events were the most frequently reported causes. In real-life studies the drop-out rate ranged from 0 to 45.5 %. In most cases lack of efficacy was responsible for treatment discontinuation. According to NEONet data, 32 % of treated patients dropped out, with an increasing number of drop outs observed over time. Patient decision and lack of efficacy accounted for most treatment withdrawals. Treatment adherence is particularly crucial in patients with severe asthma considering the clinical impact of the disease and the cost of non-adherence. The risk of treatment discontinuation has to be carefully considered both in the experimental and real-life settings. Increased knowledge regarding the main reasons for patient withdrawal is important to improve adherence in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,858,374
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#966
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,069
of 340,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.