↓ Skip to main content

Folk Concepts of Intentional Action in the Contexts of Amoral and Immoral Luck

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Folk Concepts of Intentional Action in the Contexts of Amoral and Immoral Luck
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13164-010-0028-x
Authors

Paulo Sousa, Colin Holbrook

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 46%
Philosophy 5 18%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Energy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#275
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,167
of 94,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.