↓ Skip to main content

Beliefs and Moral Valence Affect Intentionality Attributions: the Case of Side Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Beliefs and Moral Valence Affect Intentionality Attributions: the Case of Side Effects
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s13164-009-0008-1
Authors

Sandra Pellizzoni, Vittorio Girotto, Luca Surian

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Portugal 2 4%
Colombia 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 36 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 49%
Philosophy 6 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#275
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,523
of 163,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.