| Title |
Exploring whether students’ use of labelling depends upon the type of activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11412-009-9079-3 |
| Authors |
Eva Mary Bures, Philip C. Abrami, Richard F. Schmid |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 50% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 28% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#193
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,851
of 166,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.