↓ Skip to main content

The Virtues of Ignorance

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
The Virtues of Ignorance
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13164-012-0107-2
Authors

Adam Feltz, Edward T. Cokely

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
China 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Professor 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 26%
Philosophy 12 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#275
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,027
of 169,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.