↓ Skip to main content

False Heart Rate Feedback and the Perception of Heart Symptoms in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease and Anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
False Heart Rate Feedback and the Perception of Heart Symptoms in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease and Anxiety
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12529-008-9001-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra A. Karsdorp, Merel Kindt, Simon Rietveld, Walter Everaerd, Barbara J.M. Mulder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#654
of 901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,625
of 169,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.