| Title |
Determining the Impact of Walk Kansas: Applying a Team-Building Approach to Community Physical Activity Promotion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-008-9040-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A. Estabrooks, Michael Bradshaw, David A. Dzewaltowski, Renae L. Smith-Ray |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 18% |
| Psychology | 15 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1,077
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,390
of 81,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.