↓ Skip to main content

Modeling co-occurrence between toxic prey and naïve predators in an incipient invasion

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Modeling co-occurrence between toxic prey and naïve predators in an incipient invasion
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1198-3
Authors

Kerry A. Brown, Zach J. Farris, Gabriel Yesuf, Brian D. Gerber, Fidisoa Rasambainarivo, Sarah Karpanty, Marcella J. Kelly, Jean Claude Razafimahaimodison, Eileen Larney, Patricia C. Wright, Steig E. Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 45%
Environmental Science 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,961,759
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#859
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,606
of 347,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.