↓ Skip to main content

Women’s Regrets About Their Lives: Cohort Differences in Correlates and Contents

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Women’s Regrets About Their Lives: Cohort Differences in Correlates and Contents
Published in
Sex Roles, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11199-012-0126-6
Authors

Nicky Newton, Cynthia Torges, Abigail Stewart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 33%
Social Sciences 3 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,558
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,726
of 155,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.