↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of thoracic factors after scoliosis surgery in patients with both scoliosis and pectus excavatum

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of thoracic factors after scoliosis surgery in patients with both scoliosis and pectus excavatum
Published in
European Spine Journal, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00586-016-4753-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryoji Tauchi, Noriaki Kawakami, Taichi Tsuji, Tetsuya Ohara, Yoshitaka Suzuki, Toshiki Saito, Ayato Nohara

Abstract

Pectus excavatum can negatively impact cardiac function during scoliosis surgery. Several authors reported severe hypotension associated with the prone position during scoliosis surgery in children that had both scoliosis and pectus excavatum. However, we could find no studies that evaluated the change in the thoracic factors, such as sternal tilt angle and Haller index after scoliosis surgery in patients with both scoliosis and pectus excavatum. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in thoracic factors after surgical treatment for scoliosis associated with pectus excavatum. We performed a retrospective review on 20 patients (10 males and 10 females) who underwent surgical treatment for scoliosis associated with pectus excavatum from August 2004 to April 2014 in our hospital. We investigated the scoliosis diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative Cobb and thoracic kyphosis (TK) angles, the change in TK after surgery and thoracic factors, including the AP and transverse diameters of the chest, the sternal tilt angle, and Haller index. Patient mean age was 13.2 years old (4-27 years old) at surgery. Types of scoliosis were idiopathic in 8 patients, syndromic in 10, and neuromuscular in 2. The mean Cobb angles were 72.1° preoperatively and 19.0° postoperatively. Curve locations were thoracic in 13 patients, thoracolumbar in 4, and lumbar in 3. Surgical treatment of pectus excavatum was performed in 9 patients (45 %) before scoliosis treatment. Mean sternal tilt angles were 11.5° preoperatively and 11.1° postoperatively. Mean Haller indices were 4.8 preoperatively and 5.3 postoperatively. This was especially true for syndromic or neuromuscular scoliosis and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve type patients in which scoliosis surgery tended to worsen the Haller index. The Haller index increased postoperatively in 11 of 20 patients, which means sternal depression deteriorated after scoliosis surgery in about 50 % of patients. We suggest that surgeons fully assess the thoracic factors in patients with scoliosis and pectus excavatum prior to performing scoliosis surgery and carefully monitor their patient's general condition during surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,784,122
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,647
of 4,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,301
of 338,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#13
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.