↓ Skip to main content

Sexuality in High-Functioning Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 5,484)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Sexuality in High-Functioning Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2892-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A. Pecora, Gary B. Mesibov, Mark A. Stokes

Abstract

Preliminary research examining sexuality within High-Functioning Autism (HFA) has been yet to consider the impact sex may have on the sexual/romantic functioning of this population. A systematic database search was carried out to identify 27 observational and cross-sectional publications meeting predetermined inclusion criteria. Using standardised mean differences, a random-effects meta-analysis pooled data from 9 eligible studies. Exhibiting higher levels of sexual understanding, females with HFA were subject to more adverse sexual experiences than males with HFA and neurotypical counterparts. Males reported greater desire for, and engagement in both solitary and dyadic sexual contact. Findings have provided initial insight into characterising the sexuality of males and females with HFA, yet also necessitated the need for future research in the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 51 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 35%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 67 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#154,914
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#33
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,075
of 350,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.