You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
婚活における結婚の規定要因はなにか
|
---|---|
Published in |
Riron to Hoho, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.11218/ojjams.31.70 |
Authors |
小林 盾, 能智 千恵子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 48 | 24% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Moldova, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
Belize | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 149 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 203 | 100% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#263,137
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Riron to Hoho
#1
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,271
of 381,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Riron to Hoho
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.