↓ Skip to main content

Cytocompatibility of magnesium and AZ31 alloy with three types of cell lines using a direct in vitro method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Cytocompatibility of magnesium and AZ31 alloy with three types of cell lines using a direct in vitro method
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10856-016-5762-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akira Mochizuki, Chie Yahata, Hung Takai

Abstract

Magnesium alloys have been investigated by many researchers as a new absorbable biomaterial owing to their excellent degradability with non-maleficence or low-maleficence in living tissues. In the present work, the in vitro cytocompatibility of an Magnesium alloy was investigated by culturing cells directly on it. Investigations were carried out in terms of the cell viability along with the use of scanning electron microscopy to observe its morphology. The cell lines used were derived from fibroblast, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells. Pure magnesium and AZ31 alloy composed of magnesium (96 %), aluminum (3 %), and zinc (1 %) were adopted as models. The viability of cells on the metal samples and on the margin area of a multi-well plate was investigated. For direct culturing on metal, a depression in the viability and morphologically stressed cells were observed. In addition, the cell viability was also depressed for the margin area. To clarify the factors causing the negative effects, the amount of eluted metal ions and pH changes in the medium because of the erosion of the Magnesium samples were investigated, together with the cytotoxicity of sole metal ions corresponding to the composition of the metals. It was found that Mg(2+), Zn(2+), and Al(3+) ions were less toxic at the investigated concentrations, and that these factors will not produce negative effects on cells. Consequently, these factors cannot fully explain the results.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Master 4 18%
Professor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 9 41%
Engineering 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%