↓ Skip to main content

Long-term results of deep brain stimulation in a cohort of eight children with isolated dystonia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Long-term results of deep brain stimulation in a cohort of eight children with isolated dystonia
Published in
Journal of Neurology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00415-016-8253-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Krause, K. Lauritsch, A. Lipp, A. Horn, B. Weschke, A. Kupsch, K. L. Kiening, G.-H. Schneider, A. A. Kühn

Abstract

Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with severe isolated dystonia. However, clinical evidence for the long-term use of DBS in children is limited and controlled trials have not yet been conducted. Here, we provide the long-term results of up to 13 years of pallidal DBS in eight pediatric patients with generalized idiopathic or hereditary isolated dystonia (five males, mean age at surgery 12.5 ± 3.5 years), as assessed by retrospective video rating. Video rating was performed at three time points: pre-operative, 1-year short-term follow-up (1y-FU) and long-term last FU (LT-FU, up to 13 years). Symptom severity and disability were assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). Disability scores were obtained from clinical charts and during the last FU. The mean improvement in BFMDRS motor score was 54.4 ± 8.9 % at 1y-FU and 42.9 ± 11.6 % at LT-FU; the disability scores improved by 59.8 ± 10.3 and 63.3 ± 7.8 %, respectively. Electrode dislocation was noted in one patient and implantable pulse generator dislocation in another, both requiring surgical intervention; no further serious adverse events occurred. Our study presents the first blinded video rating assessment of the short- and long-term effects of pallidal DBS in children with idiopathic or hereditary isolated dystonia. Results confirm that pallidal DBS is a safe and efficacious long-term treatment in children, with overall motor improvement similar to that described in controlled trials in adults.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%