↓ Skip to main content

A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10877-016-9925-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederic Michard

Abstract

Many mobile phone or tablet applications have been designed to control cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, diabetes and hypertension) or to optimize treatment adherence. Some have been shown to be useful but the long-term benefits remain to be demonstrated. Digital stethoscopes make easier the interpretation of abnormal heart sounds, and the development of pocket-sized echo machines may quickly and significantly expand the use of ultrasounds. Daily home monitoring of pulmonary artery pressures with wireless implantable sensors has been shown to be associated with a significant decrease in hospital readmissions for heart failure. There are more and more non-invasive, wireless, and wearable sensors designed to monitor heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, arterial oxygen saturation, and thoracic fluid content. They have the potential to change the way we monitor and treat patients with cardiovascular diseases in the hospital and beyond. Some may have the ability to improve quality of care, decrease the number of medical visits and hospitalization, and ultimately health care costs. Validation and outcome studies are needed to clarify, among the growing number of digital innovations and wearable sensors, which tools have real clinical value.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 225 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 12 5%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 57 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Engineering 16 7%
Psychology 14 6%
Computer Science 13 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 70 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,738,192
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#91
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,604
of 339,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.