↓ Skip to main content

Representativeness of Participants in Heart Failure E-Health Trials: A Report From the E-Vita HF Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Representativeness of Participants in Heart Failure E-Health Trials: A Report From the E-Vita HF Study
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.08.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim P Wagenaar, Niaz Hakim, Berna D L Broekhuizen, Tiny Jaarsma, Frans H Rutten, Arno W Hoes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#1,769
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,071
of 354,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.