| Title |
Improving Quality of Care for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities via Consultation: Process Improvement and Support of Interprofessional Teams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40489-014-0031-8 |
| Authors |
Anthony J. Goreczny, Elizabeth R. Hobbs, Linda M. Peterson, Ramona M. Bosse, Carrie J. Perrell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 22% |
| Psychology | 4 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#163
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,634
of 229,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.