↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-2-s2-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig R Reinemeyer

Abstract

Since 2002, macrocyclic lactone resistance has been reported in populations of Parascaris equorum from several countries. It is apparent that macrocyclic lactone resistance developed in response to exclusive and/or excessively frequent use of ivermectin or moxidectin in foals during the first year of life. The development of anthelmintic resistance was virtually inevitable, given certain biological features of Parascaris and unique pharmacologic characteristics of the macrocyclic lactones. Practitioners can utilize the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test to detect anthelmintic resistance in Parascaris, and the same technique can be applied regularly to confirm the continued efficacy of those drugs currently in use. In the face of macrocyclic lactone resistance, piperazine or anthelmintics of the benzimidazole or pyrimidine classes can be used to control ascarid infections, but Parascaris populations that are concurrently resistant to macrocyclic lactones and pyrimidine drugs have been reported recently from Texas and Kentucky. Compared to traditional practices, future recommendations for ascarid control should feature: 1) use of only those anthelmintics known to be effective against indigenous populations, 2) initiation of anthelmintic treatment no earlier than 60 days of age, and 3) repetition of treatments at the longest intervals which prevent serious environmental contamination with Parascaris eggs. In the interest of decreasing selection pressure for anthelmintic resistance, horse owners and veterinarians must become more tolerant of the passage of modest numbers of ascarid eggs by some foals. Anthelmintic resistance is only one of several potential responses to genetic selection. Although still only theoretical, changes in the immunogenicity of ascarid isolates or reduction of their prepatent or egg reappearance periods could pose far greater challenges to effective control than resistance to a single class of anthelmintics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 35 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,691
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,302
of 106,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.