↓ Skip to main content

Assessing muscle strength for the purpose of classification in Paralympic sport: A review and recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing muscle strength for the purpose of classification in Paralympic sport: A review and recommendations
Published in
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

E.M. Beckman, M.J. Connick, S.M. Tweedy

Abstract

Classification in Paralympic Sport aims to minimize the impact of 10 eligible types of impairment on the outcome of competition. Methods for assessing the extent to which a given body structure or function has been impaired are required, but are challenging because it is not possible to directly measure an absence or loss. Rather, impairment must be inferred by measurement of extant body structures or functions. This manuscript reviews the literature concerning the assessment of strength with the aim of identifying and describing the most appropriate method for inferring strength impairment in para-athletes. It is posited that the most appropriate voluntary strength assessment method for inferring strength loss in para-athletes will be multi-joint, isometric tests performed at joint angles that facilitate maximum force production. Evidence suggests such methods will permit development of tests that are specific to a variety of para-sports and which are reliable, ratio-scaled, and resistant to training. Future research should: develop sport-specific tests which are suitable for assessment of athletes with strength impairments of variable severity and distribution; and scientifically evaluate the extent to which such tests permit strength impairment to be validly inferred, including specific evaluation of the extent to which such measures respond to athletic training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 44 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 46 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Unspecified 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 54 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,443,957
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#1,251
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,886
of 348,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#33
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.