↓ Skip to main content

Credit card Fraud

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, June 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Credit card Fraud
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, June 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02668779
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Researcher 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 33 79%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 33 79%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,317,437
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
#262
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,149
of 24,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.