↓ Skip to main content

The Anthropocene

Overview of attention for article published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 236)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
The Anthropocene
Published in
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00048-016-0146-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmuth Trischler

Abstract

In 2000, when atmospheric chemist Paul J. Crutzen and limnologist Eugene F. Stoermer proposed to introduce a new geological era, the Anthropocene, they could not have foreseen the remarkable career of the new term. Within a few years, the geological community began to investigate the scientific evidence for the concept and established the Anthropocene Working Group. While the Working Group has started to examine possible markers and periodizations of the new epoch, scholars from numerous other disciplines have taken up the Anthropocene as a cultural concept. In addition, the media have developed a deep interest in the Anthropocene's broader societal ramifications. The article sheds light on the controversial debate about the Anthropocene and discusses its inextricably linked dual careers, first as a geological term and second as a cultural term. Third, it argues that the debate about the "Age of Humans" is a timely opportunity both to rethink the nature-culture relation and to re-assess the narratives that historians of science, technology, and the environment have written until now. Specifically, it examines both the heuristic and analytical power of the concept. It discusses new histories, new ideas to understand historical change, and new temporalities shaped by scholars who have taken up the challenge of the Anthropocene as a cultural concept that has the ability to question established stories and narratives. Fourth, it ends by stressing the potential of the Anthropocene concept to blur established epistemological boundaries and to stimulate cross-disciplinary collaborations between the sciences and the humanities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 37 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 15%
Environmental Science 12 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 8%
Arts and Humanities 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 42 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,596,065
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
#5
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,949
of 352,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them