You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
For Spread of Artificial Rainmaking Technique of Liquid Carbon Dioxide: Examples of Artificial Rainmaking Experiments Carried out in 2013
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.5363/tits.20.2_88 |
| Authors |
Taichi MAKI, Osamu MORITA, Yoshinori SUZUKI, Kenji WAKIMIZU, Koji NISHIYAMA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#438
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,628
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.