| Title |
Patterns of clinical practice for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with node-negative breast cancer: the results of a national survey in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12282-016-0720-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takafumi Ikeda, Tomoharu Sugie, Akira Shimizu, Masakazu Toi |
| Abstract |
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is now accepted as the standard of care for axillary staging in women with node-negative breast cancer. Currently, dye, radioisotope (RI), and fluorescence indocyanine green (fICG) are tracers available. Importance of these three tracers has been recognized for SLN biopsy but the trend for SLN mapping has not been reported. Aim of this national wide survey was to evaluate practice patterns of SLN biopsy in Japan. This survey was conducted to examine the clinical practice of SLN biopsy in centers where one or more Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) board-certified surgeons practice breast cancer care. Their responses were recorded from 1 to 30 Oct 2014 and received by mail or fax in Japan. The questionnaire included three items: the number of breast cancer patients treated per year, the number of SLN biopsy procedures in a single year, and the methods for SLN detection. A total of 412 responses excluding the 63 centers that do not perform the surgery were analyzed. Out of them, 206 (50 %) centers had a gamma probe, 118 (29 %) had an NIR fluorescence imaging system, and both were available at 49 (12 %) of the centers. Neither RI nor fICG was available in 137 (33 %). The dye method was preferentially used in private hospitals. In 412 centers, a total of 36,221 patients underwent SLN biopsy per year and 23,038 (64 %) received radioactive tracer. fICG was co-applied with RI in 83 and 13 % of patients, respectively. Single mapping with RI alone was used in only 4 % of patients. The non-radioactive method was used for routine SLN biopsy in 13,183 (36 %) patients [8533 (24 %) for dye alone and 4650 (12 %) for fICG alone]. A radioactive tracer was used in 64 % of women with early breast cancer for SLN biopsy while approximately 24 % received dye alone, which was especially prevalent in PHs. The fICG was used in only 12 % as a non-radioactive method but incentive package for fICG by national health insurance plan could increase the number of NIR imaging systems and improve the sensitivity for SLN biopsy in Japan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer
#498
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,739
of 349,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.